The Facebook Criminal

It’s funny how Facebook has become so involved in today's society…Ahmed Hassan Bassyouni, an Egyptian man, was sentenced to six months in jail for starting a Facebook group to advise those interested in joining the military. Bassyouni said that his Facebook group did not represent the views of the government; he was simply giving advice on how to enlist and how to prepare the necessary papers. He was accused of “spreading military secrets over the Internet without permission.” Amnesty International urged the release of Bassyouni on the grounds that he was “being tried solely for publishing information readily available in the public domain.”

Personally, I think this whole ordeal is a bit ridiculous. It’s not like he was saying negative things about the military or government, and even if he were, its only Facebook…It seems to me that the Egyptian government should have bigger fish to fry.

What do you think?

A Fresh Arab Identity?

This is kind of in response to Nadia’s post, "Money, Money, Money..." I recently came across a very interesting article from the New York Times that discusses how Abu Dhabi and Qatar are using architecture and art to reshape their identities. Both Abu Dhabi and Qatar have sponsored the building of art museums and cultural centers. “Their goal is not only to build a more positive image of the Middle East at a time when anti-Islamic sentiment continues to build across Europe and the United States, but also to create a kind of latter-day Silk Road, one on which their countries are powerful cultural and economic hinges between the West and rising powers like India and China.” By focusing on art and culture, both countries are putting their wealth to good use for the advancement of their national identities. This social transformation is happening very quickly; however, some Arabs see fault with the plans.

As Nadia discussed (and I commented), there is a huge amount of excess in these oil-rich countries. However, while some of the things in Abu Dhabi may be excessive, this is a good use of the state’s wealth. These countries have lots of money to spend; it's good that they are using this money to make social and cultural changes. By trying to strike a balance between modernization and Islamism, these countries are doing themselves a favor. Their strides towards “redeem[ing] the tarnished image of Arabs abroad while showing the way toward a modern society within the boundaries of Islam” really helps to make these countries more accessible.

Here's the article if you're interested in reading it!! http://www.nytimes.com/2010/11/27/arts/design/27museums.html?pagewanted=1&ref=middleeast

Yemeni terrorism?

http://www.cnn.com/2010/OPINION/11/08/varisco.yemen.terrorism/index.html

In his opinion piece, Daniel Varisco outlines his belief that Yemen is not a terrorist breeding ground, although recent news has seen quite a few terrorist plots coming from Yemen (including the Christmas underwear bomber, Anwar al-Awlaqi, an Islamic lecturer who has inspired Islamic terrorism against the West, and Ibrahim al-Asiri, the suspected mastermind behind the toner bombs planted on cargo planes coming from Yemen).

Varisco asserts that “the main reason Yemen is not becoming a major international terrorist base is that the Yemeni people have their own internal problems to resolve.” While this may be true, I am certain that the Yemeni people have the ability to multitask. He goes on to claim “Yemen could indeed become a terrorist haven if the United States continues to meddle in local politics and see international terrorists behind every bush.”

I completely disagree with this stance. While his assertion that the United States needs to make sure that it is not creating terrorists by being too overbearing is reasonable, I feel that the United States has a responsibility to American citizens and the rest of the world to ensure that preventable terrorist attacks do not occur. There is no such thing as being too cautious; recent plots have come out of Yemen, therefore the United States has reason to suspect that there are terrorist actions occurring in the country. It would be a travesty if the United States backed down from fighting terrorism and protecting Americans just because we are wary of being too imperious.   

Islamophobia

Last month, there was a deadly attack on Sayidat al-Nejat Cathedral (Our Lady of Salvation Church) in Baghdad. The Islamic State of Iraq, an umbrella group that includes a number of extremist organizations and has ties to al Qaeda, claimed responsibility for the attack, which killed 70 and wounded 75. In recent days, twelve suspected terrorists have been arrested. This attack was the first of many targeting Christians over the past few weeks.

While there might not be a direct connection between these attacks and the current culture in the United States, I think that the United States is in an interesting position. The United States cannot ask those in the Middle East to stop targeting Christians with the current amount of Islamophobia found in our country. As a dominant world power, we need to set an example for the rest of the world. The heightened prejudice against Muslims in the United States does nothing to help soothe the relations between the United States and Muslim groups. So while I am not arguing that everyone should join hands and sing “Kumbayah”, tolerance of Islam can only help our image abroad. 

al-Maliki's Second Term as PM

While we were eating turkey, the Iraqis were shaping their government. Last Thursday, Iraqi President Jalal Talabani officially named Nuri al-Maliki to a second term as Prime Minister in a televised ceremony. His nomination came after months of dispute and power struggles within Iraq following the March elections. al-Maliki has the task of forming a new cabinet and only has thirty days to do so. Al-Maliki urges the Iraqi people and politicians “to work on getting past all the disputes that had dominated the past stages" in order to achieve success. In the proposed cabinet, the three major governmental positions will be filled by members of Iraq’s largest ethnic groups: the Shiites, the Kurds and the Sunnis. President Obama is very satisfied with this plan.

Personally, I am pleased to see the Iraqis continuing to work towards solidifying their government.  I feel that by having the three largest ethnic groups play influential roles, the people of Iraq will be best represented. I am interested to see what al-Maliki does during his second term.

http://www.cnn.com/2010/WORLD/meast/11/25/iraq.al.maliki.pm/index.html

Simulation

I think that Peacemaker is a great learning tool. I got a little too into it today and spent a good portion of my afternoon playing it.  I experimented with both violence and diplomacy, yet each time I tried the simulation, it resulted in the Third Intifada. As a highly competitive person, I wanted to keep playing until I was able to reach peace. I’d get very close and then there would be one tiny thing that would throw off the entire peace process.  This is an accurate representation of how things work in the Middle East, since even small actions can have large consequences on the peace process.  

It was difficult for me to make some of the decisions, particularly when I was trying to take the diplomatic route. I didn’t want to lose approval from either side so I tended to play it safe with my decisions. By not taking direct action, I ended up not being the strongest leader (which the game told me each time I lost!) 

The simulation builds upon what we have learned through course readings and class discussions; by playing the simulation, I was able to put what I have learned to practical use. I wouldn’t say that I learned any substantive information from the simulation, but it was definitely a good way to see how different actions affect the peace process. While it is a nice break from staring at a textbook, the simulation is an effective learning tool because it makes the conflict seem more real to people not directly impacted by it.